Start with the obvious question. How far does 50 kilometres really get you out of Vancouver? The map above answers it, and the answer is usually further than people picture. Circles are drawn at 5, 10, 25 and 50 kilometres from 49.2497, -123.1193. Once the page loads they’re ordinary shapes, so resize them or drag them wherever you like.
Inside the full 50 km circle, GeoNames counts 19 towns and cities holding about 2,680,978 people, Vancouver included. The closest is Riley Park, 2 km east-south-east. Past the 25 km mark things thin out noticeably, which the ring populations further down make obvious.
A quick anchor for the scale. Ten kilometres from the centre reaches roughly to West Vancouver, 9.3 km north-north-west. The furthest name in these tables is Maple Ridge, 37.7 km away to the east, and it still sits inside the outer circle. People underestimate that big ring every time, which is most of why this page exists.
One caution before you lean on the table. A GeoNames centre is a single point, usually somewhere near the historic core, and a city isn’t a point. Riley Park is listed at 2 km because that’s the gap between two reference points. Its nearer edge is closer than that, probably by a good margin.
1 place inside 5 km, 22,555 people, 79 km² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riley Park | 2 km | ESE 111° | 22,555 |
4 places between 5 and 10 km, 374,657 people, 236 km² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria-Fraserview | 5.3 km | SE 134° | 31,065 |
| North Vancouver | 8.3 km | NNE 26° | 88,168 |
| Richmond | 8.9 km | S 188° | 209,937 |
| West Vancouver | 9.3 km | NNW 341° | 45,487 |
7 places between 10 and 25 km, 712,411 people, 1,649 km² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burnaby | 12.2 km | E 81° | 249,125 |
| New Westminster | 15.9 km | ESE 107° | 78,916 |
| Delta | 18.5 km | SSE 165° | 101,668 |
| Strawberry Hill | 21.5 km | SE 127° | 41,000 |
| Port Moody | 21.7 km | E 81° | 27,512 |
| Coquitlam | 24.8 km | E 81° | 148,625 |
| Fleetwood | 25 km | ESE 112° | 65,565 |
7 places between 25 and 50 km, 909,107 people, 5,890 km² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Port Coquitlam | 25.5 km | E 86° | 58,000 |
| Surrey | 26.7 km | SE 127° | 568,322 |
| Pitt Meadows | 31.4 km | E 96° | 18,573 |
| White Rock | 34.7 km | SE 137° | 23,670 |
| Walnut Grove | 36.1 km | ESE 105° | 25,683 |
| Langley | 37.3 km | ESE 116° | 132,603 |
| Maple Ridge | 37.7 km | E 95° | 82,256 |
Place names, coordinates and populations come from GeoNames, which the site uses under CC BY 4.0.
Area climbs with the square of the radius, and it catches people out every time. The 5 km disc around Vancouver covers 79 km². The 25 km one covers 1,963 km², twenty-five times as much for five times the distance. By 50 km you’re looking at 7,854 km² of British Columbia and whatever lies past its edges.
| Radius | Area inside (km²) | This band only (km²) | Places in band | People in band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 km | 79 | 79 | 1 | 22,555 |
| 10 km | 314 | 236 | 4 | 374,657 |
| 25 km | 1,963 | 1,649 | 7 | 712,411 |
| 50 km | 7,854 | 5,890 | 7 | 909,107 |
Put the two tables together and you get a crude density. Inside the 25 km circle there are about 1,771,871 listed people spread over 1,963 km², so roughly 903 per km². Crude is the right word. It counts GeoNames settlements only, so villages and open country vanish, and it treats a harbour or a reservoir as populated ground.
These are straight-line rings. That’s the right tool for a coverage question and the wrong one for travel time. A 30-minute drive out of Vancouver comes out as a lopsided blob, an isochrone, racing down a motorway and stopping dead at a bridge. Drawing one properly takes a routing server. This site hasn’t got one, deliberately, because everything runs in your browser with no account and nothing uploaded.
Plenty of sites draw a plain circle, label it drive time and leave it there. Those are worth ignoring. A proper isochrone needs a road graph, turn restrictions and some idea of traffic, and it changes shape by the hour. What a circle gives you instead is a bound that doesn’t move: nothing outside the 25 km ring is within 25 kilometres of Vancouver, whatever the roads do.
Where it all comes from. Names, coordinates and populations are GeoNames cities15000, which covers settlements of roughly 15,000 people and up. Anything smaller is simply absent. City subdivisions get stripped out on purpose, so a page about Vancouver doesn’t fill with its own neighbourhoods instead of its neighbours. Distances are haversine on a 6,371.0088 km sphere, areas are spherical caps.
One oddity you’ll notice if you compare pages. Population counts come from GeoNames, which records what the national statistics office last published, so some are a few years old and a couple are more. They’re good for ranking and for rough sizing. The figure carried for Vancouver is 662,248, which for some cities means the municipality and for others the whole urban area, so compare it with care.
What people actually use these rings for, roughly in order of how often it comes up: delivery and service areas, finding somewhere to live within a sensible distance of work, sizing a catchment for a shop or a clinic, checking how far an event’s noise and traffic will carry. Straight-line distance is the right first pass for all of them.
The five closest cities with their own page are listed below, measured from this same centre. Seattle is nearest at 191.8 km south-south-east, which means its 50 km ring never comes anywhere near this one.