Manchester sits at 53.481, -2.2374, and the four circles above start from there. 5, 10, 25 and 50 miles. They’re live shapes, not a picture of some. Click one and you can pull it to a different size, drop another on top of it, or shift the whole set onto the exact street corner you had in mind.
The short version. 185 separate places sit inside the 50 mi circle, worth about 11,514,720 people between them, and that’s counting only settlements GeoNames lists at 15,000 or more. The 5 mi ring alone holds 7. Nearest of the lot is Salford, 2.2 mi west-north-west. For catchment work that density is the whole difficulty, because almost any radius you pick swallows a dozen towns at once.
A quick anchor for the scale. Ten miles from the centre reaches roughly to Rochdale, 10 mi north-north-east. The furthest name in these tables is Derby, 49.8 mi away to the south-east, and it still sits inside the outer circle. People underestimate that big ring every time, which is most of why this page exists.
Read the distances as point to point. GeoNames gives every settlement one coordinate, roughly central, and these figures are the gaps between those coordinates. A sprawling suburb whose centre lands at 10 mi might well start at half that. Where the boundary actually matters, draw the circle and look at where the line crosses.
7 places inside 5 mi, 307,697 people, 79 mi² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salford | 2.2 mi | WNW 282° | 129,794 |
| Failsworth | 3.4 mi | ENE 61° | 20,555 |
| Droylsden | 3.8 mi | E 91° | 23,689 |
| Stretford | 3.9 mi | WSW 237° | 41,953 |
| Eccles | 3.9 mi | W 272° | 37,275 |
| Prestwich | 4.1 mi | NNW 332° | 31,500 |
| Swinton | 4.8 mi | WNW 286° | 22,931 |
25 places between 5 and 10 mi, 1,122,462 people, 236 mi² of ground. The 10 largest are in the table; 15 smaller ones aren’t.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Middleton | 5 mi | NNE 18° | 45,589 |
| Sale | 5.3 mi | SW 223° | 62,550 |
| Urmston | 5.3 mi | WSW 245° | 41,731 |
| Ashton-under-Lyne | 5.7 mi | E 85° | 43,675 |
| Stockport | 5.9 mi | SE 146° | 139,052 |
| Chadderton | 6 mi | NE 42° | 37,602 |
| Oldham | 6.4 mi | NE 50° | 237,110 |
| Altrincham | 7.9 mi | SW 215° | 49,680 |
| Bury | 8.6 mi | NNW 343° | 61,044 |
| Tyldesley | 9.7 mi | WNW 284° | 35,932 |
45 places between 10 and 25 mi, 2,486,765 people, 1,649 mi² of ground. The 12 largest are in the table; 33 smaller ones aren’t.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rochdale | 10 mi | NNE 20° | 97,550 |
| Bolton | 10.7 mi | NW 311° | 141,331 |
| Rossendale | 14.2 mi | N 353° | 67,400 |
| Warrington | 15.4 mi | WSW 247° | 172,330 |
| Wigan | 17 mi | WNW 285° | 175,405 |
| High Peak | 17.9 mi | ESE 116° | 92,666 |
| St Helens | 20.5 mi | W 264° | 183,200 |
| Blackburn | 21.1 mi | NNW 332° | 146,521 |
| Huddersfield | 21.9 mi | ENE 58° | 149,017 |
| Widnes | 22 mi | WSW 248° | 61,464 |
| Burnley | 22 mi | N 0° | 149,422 |
| Halifax | 22.8 mi | NE 44° | 82,624 |
108 places between 25 and 50 mi, 7,028,800 people, 5,890 mi² of ground. The 12 largest are in the table; 96 smaller ones aren’t.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preston | 27.3 mi | NW 316° | 313,332 |
| Bradford | 29.4 mi | NE 42° | 366,187 |
| Liverpool | 30.9 mi | W 261° | 496,770 |
| Sheffield | 32.5 mi | ESE 102° | 556,500 |
| Birkenhead | 32.6 mi | W 260° | 325,264 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 33 mi | S 176° | 258,366 |
| Newcastle under Lyme | 33.2 mi | S 180° | 127,727 |
| Leeds | 35.7 mi | NE 52° | 536,280 |
| Rotherham | 36.4 mi | E 95° | 117,618 |
| Blackpool | 40.6 mi | NW 305° | 145,007 |
| Mansfield | 49.1 mi | ESE 119° | 171,958 |
| Derby | 49.8 mi | SE 140° | 270,468 |
Place names, coordinates and populations come from GeoNames, which the site uses under CC BY 4.0.
Area climbs with the square of the radius, and it catches people out every time. The 5 mi disc around Manchester covers 79 mi². The 25 mi one covers 1,963 mi², twenty-five times as much for five times the distance. By 50 mi you’re looking at 7,854 mi² of England and whatever lies past its edges.
| Radius | Area inside (mi²) | This band only (mi²) | Places in band | People in band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mi (8.05 km) | 79 | 79 | 7 | 307,697 |
| 10 mi (16.09 km) | 314 | 236 | 25 | 1,122,462 |
| 25 mi (40.23 km) | 1,963 | 1,649 | 45 | 2,486,765 |
| 50 mi (80.47 km) | 7,854 | 5,890 | 108 | 7,028,800 |
Cross the two tables and something useful falls out. The 25 mi disc holds 4,485,920 listed people across 1,963 mi², about 2,285 per mi². Push out to 50 and you buy 5,890 mi² more for only 7,028,800 extra people. Most of that last band is empty, which is what you’d expect and still surprises people when they see it drawn.
Every circle here is a straight-line radius, measured crow-flies. Derby shows up at 49.8 mi south-east, and the road out there will be longer. Always is. In a town laid out on a grid, reckon on 20 to 40 per cent more actual travel than the radius says. Put a river, a harbour or a decent hill in the way and that rule of thumb stops meaning much at all.
If travel time is genuinely what you need, use these rings to narrow the field first and check the survivors properly afterwards. The circle is cheap, instant, and honest about what it measures. It also can’t tell you that the 10 mi to the north crosses water while the same 10 mi to the south is dual carriageway the whole way.
Where it all comes from. Names, coordinates and populations are GeoNames cities15000, which covers settlements of roughly 15,000 people and up. Anything smaller is simply absent. City subdivisions get stripped out on purpose, so a page about Manchester doesn’t fill with its own neighbourhoods instead of its neighbours. Distances are haversine on a 6,371.0088 km sphere, areas are spherical caps.
All of it was computed when the site was built, then written into a file that ships with the page. Nothing here is fetched while you read. That’s why the tables are in the HTML the server sends rather than appearing a second later, and it’s why the figures can’t drift: rerun the build and every number on all fifty of these pages is recalculated from the same dump.
Most of the traffic to a page like this is practical. Somebody wants to know which towns near Manchester fall inside a service area, or how many people live within 25 miles of a site they’re weighing up. The table answers the first one outright. For the second, take the ring populations as a floor, since everything under 15,000 people is missing from them.
The five closest cities with their own page are listed below, measured from this same centre. Liverpool is nearest at 30.9 mi west, which means its 50 mi ring overlaps this one.