Liverpool sits at 53.4106, -2.9779, and the four circles above start from there. 5, 10, 25 and 50 miles. They’re live shapes, not a picture of some. Click one and you can pull it to a different size, drop another on top of it, or shift the whole set onto the exact street corner you had in mind.
The short version. 130 separate places sit inside the 50 mi circle, worth about 7,699,803 people between them, and that’s counting only settlements GeoNames lists at 15,000 or more. The 5 mi ring alone holds 8. Nearest of the lot is Birkenhead, 1.9 mi south-west. For catchment work that density is the whole difficulty, because almost any radius you pick swallows a dozen towns at once.
A quick anchor for the scale. Ten miles from the centre reaches roughly to Ellesmere Port Town, 9.6 mi south-south-east. The furthest name in these tables is Stoke-on-Trent, 43.2 mi away to the south-east, and it still sits inside the outer circle. People underestimate that big ring every time, which is most of why this page exists.
Read the distances as point to point. GeoNames gives every settlement one coordinate, roughly central, and these figures are the gaps between those coordinates. A sprawling suburb whose centre lands at 10 mi might well start at half that. Where the boundary actually matters, draw the circle and look at where the line crosses.
8 places inside 5 mi, 569,930 people, 79 mi² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birkenhead | 1.9 mi | SW 232° | 325,264 |
| Old Swan | 2.9 mi | E 85° | 15,596 |
| Wallasey | 3.7 mi | WNW 284° | 58,794 |
| Fazakerley | 4.1 mi | NNE 30° | 16,374 |
| Litherland | 4.2 mi | N 349° | 22,971 |
| Bootle | 4.2 mi | NNW 338° | 57,791 |
| Bebington | 4.5 mi | SSW 201° | 57,600 |
| Allerton | 4.6 mi | SE 131° | 15,540 |
11 places between 5 and 10 mi, 358,663 people, 236 mi² of ground. The 10 largest are in the table; 1 smaller ones aren’t.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huyton | 5.7 mi | E 89° | 54,738 |
| Moreton | 5.8 mi | W 263° | 17,670 |
| Kirkby | 6 mi | NE 36° | 45,564 |
| Garston | 6.2 mi | SSE 149° | 21,403 |
| Halewood | 7 mi | ESE 120° | 20,430 |
| Speke | 7.4 mi | SE 130° | 21,403 |
| Prescot | 7.4 mi | E 80° | 40,889 |
| Maghull | 7.5 mi | NNE 12° | 26,997 |
| Heswall | 7.5 mi | SW 220° | 29,075 |
| Ellesmere Port Town | 9.6 mi | SSE 161° | 65,430 |
35 places between 10 and 25 mi, 1,687,206 people, 1,649 mi² of ground. The 12 largest are in the table; 23 smaller ones aren’t.
| Place | Region | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Helens | 10.4 mi | ENE 75° | 183,200 | |
| Widnes | 10.6 mi | ESE 108° | 61,464 | |
| Runcorn | 11.2 mi | ESE 115° | 61,145 | |
| Great Sankey | 14 mi | E 95° | 43,793 | |
| Chester | 15.6 mi | SSE 167° | 90,524 | |
| Southport | 16.3 mi | N 355° | 91,703 | |
| Warrington | 16.4 mi | E 94° | 172,330 | |
| Wigan | 16.7 mi | ENE 57° | 175,405 | |
| Buckley | Wales | 17.4 mi | SSW 195° | 63,576 |
| Leigh | 19.8 mi | ENE 72° | 43,626 | |
| Northwich | 21.6 mi | ESE 119° | 47,421 | |
| Lytham St Annes | 23 mi | N 358° | 42,695 |
76 places between 25 and 50 mi, 4,587,234 people, 5,890 mi² of ground. The 12 largest are in the table; 64 smaller ones aren’t.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolton | 25.4 mi | ENE 62° | 141,331 |
| Preston | 26.8 mi | NNE 25° | 313,332 |
| Blackpool | 28.2 mi | N 354° | 145,007 |
| Salford | 28.8 mi | E 79° | 129,794 |
| Manchester | 30.9 mi | E 81° | 568,996 |
| Blackburn | 31 mi | NE 41° | 146,521 |
| Stockport | 33.8 mi | E 90° | 139,052 |
| Oldham | 36.5 mi | ENE 75° | 237,110 |
| Rochdale | 36.7 mi | ENE 67° | 97,550 |
| Burnley | 40.7 mi | NE 48° | 149,422 |
| Newcastle under Lyme | 41.9 mi | SE 132° | 127,727 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 43.2 mi | SE 130° | 258,366 |
Place names, coordinates and populations come from GeoNames, which the site uses under CC BY 4.0.
Worth pausing on the areas. 79 mi² inside 5 mi. 314 inside 10. 7,854 by the time you reach 50. Each step looks modest on screen and is anything but on the ground, because the maths squares the radius while your eye just reads a line that got a bit wider.
| Radius | Area inside (mi²) | This band only (mi²) | Places in band | People in band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mi (8.05 km) | 79 | 79 | 8 | 569,930 |
| 10 mi (16.09 km) | 314 | 236 | 11 | 358,663 |
| 25 mi (40.23 km) | 1,963 | 1,649 | 35 | 1,687,206 |
| 50 mi (80.47 km) | 7,854 | 5,890 | 76 | 4,587,234 |
Cross the two tables and something useful falls out. The 25 mi disc holds 3,112,569 listed people across 1,963 mi², about 1,586 per mi². Push out to 50 and you buy 5,890 mi² more for only 4,587,234 extra people. Most of that last band is empty, which is what you’d expect and still surprises people when they see it drawn.
Straight line, not drive time, and the difference bites hardest on the big ring. Manchester comes out at 30.9 mi from here as the crow flies, and nobody has ever driven it in a straight line. Use the circle as an outer bound. Treat anything sitting near the edge as optimistic, because real travel distance beats the radius every time and the gap grows with whatever the terrain throws in.
If travel time is genuinely what you need, use these rings to narrow the field first and check the survivors properly afterwards. The circle is cheap, instant, and honest about what it measures. It also can’t tell you that the 10 mi to the north crosses water while the same 10 mi to the south is dual carriageway the whole way.
Two things about the method. Distance is measured over the curve of the Earth, not across the flat map image, which is where a surprising number of simpler tools quietly go wrong. And the Earth gets treated as a sphere when it’s really a bit squashed, costing a fraction of a per cent. Fine for a catchment. No use for settling a boundary, so don’t try.
All of it was computed when the site was built, then written into a file that ships with the page. Nothing here is fetched while you read. That’s why the tables are in the HTML the server sends rather than appearing a second later, and it’s why the figures can’t drift: rerun the build and every number on all fifty of these pages is recalculated from the same dump.
Most of the traffic to a page like this is practical. Somebody wants to know which towns near Liverpool fall inside a service area, or how many people live within 25 miles of a site they’re weighing up. The table answers the first one outright. For the second, take the ring populations as a floor, since everything under 15,000 people is missing from them.
The five closest cities with their own page are listed below, measured from this same centre. Manchester is nearest at 30.9 mi east, which means its 50 mi ring overlaps this one.