Four circles are on the map already, centred on 39.7684, -86.158. That’s where GeoNames puts Indianapolis, close enough to the middle of town for most of what people bring here. The rings step out at 5, 10, 25 and 50 miles. Every figure in the tables below was measured from that one point, so if your centre belongs somewhere else, drag it and read the map instead of the table.
Inside the full 50 mi circle, GeoNames counts 23 towns and cities holding about 1,763,916 people, Indianapolis included. The closest is Broad Ripple, 6.8 mi north. Past the 25 mi mark things thin out noticeably, which the ring populations further down make obvious.
The inner circle has no GeoNames name anywhere on it, which tells you something about how Indianapolis is built. At the other end, Kokomo is 49.6 mi out to the north, near enough the edge of the 50 mi ring. Everything in between scales from those two.
One caution before you lean on the table. A GeoNames centre is a single point, usually somewhere near the historic core, and a city isn’t a point. Broad Ripple is listed at 6.8 mi because that’s the gap between two reference points. Its nearer edge is closer than that, probably by a good margin.
No entries. This band covers 79 mi² and nothing in it clears the 15,000 floor.
2 places between 5 and 10 mi, 64,850 people, 236 mi² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broad Ripple | 6.8 mi | N 7° | 17,041 |
| Lawrence | 8.6 mi | NE 55° | 47,809 |
12 places between 10 and 25 mi, 482,637 people, 1,649 mi² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenwood | 11 mi | SSE 166° | 55,586 |
| Fairfield Heights | 12.6 mi | WNW 289° | 21,285 |
| Avon | 12.8 mi | W 268° | 16,451 |
| Plainfield | 13.6 mi | WSW 251° | 30,590 |
| Brownsburg | 13.7 mi | WNW 292° | 24,996 |
| Zionsville | 13.8 mi | NNW 336° | 26,296 |
| Carmel | 14.7 mi | N 8° | 88,713 |
| Fishers | 15 mi | NNE 31° | 76,794 |
| Westfield | 19 mi | N 5° | 36,738 |
| Franklin | 20.6 mi | SSE 165° | 24,598 |
| Greenfield | 20.7 mi | E 87° | 21,497 |
| Noblesville | 20.7 mi | NNE 22° | 59,093 |
9 places between 25 and 50 mi, 328,787 people, 5,890 mi² of ground.
| Place | Distance | Bearing | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lebanon | 25.4 mi | NW 320° | 15,892 |
| Shelbyville | 26.5 mi | SE 130° | 19,133 |
| Anderson | 34.4 mi | NE 47° | 55,305 |
| Frankfort | 39.9 mi | NNW 332° | 16,060 |
| Columbus | 41.2 mi | SSE 162° | 46,690 |
| Crawfordsville | 42.4 mi | WNW 297° | 16,024 |
| New Castle | 43.2 mi | ENE 75° | 17,621 |
| Bloomington | 46.1 mi | SSW 205° | 84,067 |
| Kokomo | 49.6 mi | N 1° | 57,995 |
Place names, coordinates and populations come from GeoNames, which the site uses under CC BY 4.0.
Here’s the thing people get wrong about a radius. Double it and you quadruple the ground underneath. Going from 5 miles to 50 multiplies the area by a hundred, so 79 mi² becomes 7,854 mi². The outermost band on its own, the gap between the 25 and 50 mi circles, accounts for 5,890 mi². Three quarters of everything inside the big circle, in one band.
| Radius | Area inside (mi²) | This band only (mi²) | Places in band | People in band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mi (8.05 km) | 79 | 79 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 mi (16.09 km) | 314 | 236 | 2 | 64,850 |
| 25 mi (40.23 km) | 1,963 | 1,649 | 12 | 482,637 |
| 50 mi (80.47 km) | 7,854 | 5,890 | 9 | 328,787 |
Put the two tables together and you get a crude density. Inside the 25 mi circle there are about 1,435,129 listed people spread over 1,963 mi², so roughly 731 per mi². Crude is the right word. It counts GeoNames settlements only, so villages and open country vanish, and it treats a harbour or a reservoir as populated ground.
Every circle here is a straight-line radius, measured crow-flies. Kokomo shows up at 49.6 mi north, and the road out there will be longer. Always is. In a town laid out on a grid, reckon on 20 to 40 per cent more actual travel than the radius says. Put a river, a harbour or a decent hill in the way and that rule of thumb stops meaning much at all.
Plenty of sites draw a plain circle, label it drive time and leave it there. Those are worth ignoring. A proper isochrone needs a road graph, turn restrictions and some idea of traffic, and it changes shape by the hour. What a circle gives you instead is a bound that doesn’t move: nothing outside the 25 mi ring is within 25 miles of Indianapolis, whatever the roads do.
Where it all comes from. Names, coordinates and populations are GeoNames cities15000, which covers settlements of roughly 15,000 people and up. Anything smaller is simply absent. City subdivisions get stripped out on purpose, so a page about Indianapolis doesn’t fill with its own neighbourhoods instead of its neighbours. Distances are haversine on a 6,371.0088 km sphere, areas are spherical caps.
One oddity you’ll notice if you compare pages. Population counts come from GeoNames, which records what the national statistics office last published, so some are a few years old and a couple are more. They’re good for ranking and for rough sizing. The figure carried for Indianapolis is 887,642, which for some cities means the municipality and for others the whole urban area, so compare it with care.
What people actually use these rings for, roughly in order of how often it comes up: delivery and service areas, finding somewhere to live within a sensible distance of work, sizing a catchment for a shop or a clinic, checking how far an event’s noise and traffic will carry. Straight-line distance is the right first pass for all of them.
The five closest cities with their own page are listed below, measured from this same centre. Chicago is nearest at 163.6 mi north-north-west, which means its 50 mi ring never comes anywhere near this one.